Defined Correspondence Theorem for Quotients
Take a ring with , and for some ideal .
Remark
Given morphism , if , then .
Remark
If is a morphism, , not necessarily surjective. Then is an additive subgroup, but not necessarily an ideal.
Remark
If , , , then .
Proof
We already know from groups, .
If , and if . Thus, .
Remark
, that does not necessarily contain . Then, does not even make sense as additive group, if .
Question: What is ? (Where , set of cosets in ) Answer: It is still an ideal: .
Note: , , so .
Example
The image of in is
With the previous remark: We get .
Defined Units in Rings
Given ring with . Assume is commutative.
Remark
is a unit if and only if (, ).
Remark
For any , there exists given by . is additive: .
The following are equivalent:
- is a unit.
- is surjective.
- is bijective.
In this case, , with defined by .